Skip to main content

This blog post was published under the 2015-2024 Conservative Administration

https://nda.blog.gov.uk/one-more-pond-to-drain/

One more pond to drain

Posted by: , Posted on: - Categories: Skills, Waste management
Shot of all the ponds team
The ponds team

Focus on Chapelcross

Pond clean-up activities across Magnox are now focused on Chapelcross Site, the only site with water still to be drained down.

While Oldbury, Sizewell A and Dungeness A Sites have recently completed draining and decontamination programmes, the Scottish site team estimates that around 5 more years are required to reach a similar stage – that’s without taking any coronavirus impacts into account.

It’s not a question of being behind the curve, however, but of first needing an Advanced Vacuum Drying System (AVDS) and Interim Storage Facility (ISF) where waste packages can be safely stored after retrieval and treatment, both of which have recently been completed.

Relatively clean

Unusually, the Chapelcross ponds themselves, each containing 1,775 cubic metres of water, were periodically drained for cleaning during the site’s operational life and are expected to be relatively clean.

Decommissioning began in 2010 and pond 1 was fully drained 9 years ago, with some contents transferred to pond 2, including sludge.

Pond 2 contains 87 redundant fuel skips, 50 skips holding zeolite resin used to remove soluble radioactivity from the pond water, almost 10 cubic metres of sludge, and 34 baskets of high-dose items such as miscellaneous activated components (MAC) and cobalt – some of which arose because one of the 4 reactors produced radioisotopes for medical purposes.

Cut up under water

Preparations have been under way for a number of years already, with much of the necessary characterisation and sorting completed. Many larger components were cut up under water, using remotely operated equipment – and 1,000 cuts - before transfer into baskets which remain below the surface, ready for loading.

Paul Ewart at computer screen
Located at a safe distance, Paul Ewart cuts up pond equipment

Ponds Project Manager, Allen Richardson, said the site had shared its earlier learning and design with Oldbury Site, after developing the handling equipment to lift out the MAC and cobalt, removing the need for them to start from scratch.

The next step, once the MAC and cobalt are removed, is to retrieve and condition the 50 zeolite skips, which will be stored in the ISF.

Sludge transfer

The zeolite skips will be transferred to an overpack while under water, then removed and drilled to drain out the water. They will then be transferred into a concrete box and cement-grouted, while lead-shielded Mosaik cylinders will be used for other waste, and the contents dried in the AVDS.

Overhead shot of large yellow Mosaik cyclinder
A Mosaik cylinder at Chapelcross

Sludge will be transferred into Mosaiks for AVDS conditioning and drying, then stored in the ISF.

When the coronavirus pandemic eventually allows the above work to be completed, specialist nuclear divers will be used to further size-reduce large items and lift out smaller ones. The move follows the recent success with dive teams at Dungeness A and Sizewell A Sites, and at Winfrith Site during the 1990s.

Pond facts

  • most nuclear reactors world-wide, and other fuel cycle facilities, use ponds to cool spent fuel
  • average Magnox pond depth is around 6-7 metres
  • all are configured differently but each contains 2,000–3,300 cubic metres of water
  • Hunterston A, the largest, had 6,000 cubic metres
  • ponds typically have additional bays and tunnels
  • the first Magnox ponds to be drained, in the 1990s, were Berkeley and Trawsfynydd
  • typical contents include desplittering equipment, sludge, IonSivs, fuel skips and sludge
  • drained liquid is filtered through treatment facilities before being discharged via the sites’ active effluent discharge route
  • across the 10 Magnox reactor sites, the whole ponds clean-up programme is anticipated to cost around £300 million
  • simple innovative processes and shared learning have reduced original estimates by £45 million

Sharing and comments

Share this page